ESScope a diagnosis
Menu

Corporate Diagnosis

Reveal what can release—or destroy—value.

Connect financial and operating evidence, model the value drivers and test the risks before committing capital or management attention.

Scope a diagnosis
A precision structure opened into layers to reveal its internal drivers

From inputs to a prioritized course of action

The diagnosis is structured to identify value drivers, financial risks and improvement opportunities.

DCF

Connect projected cash flows, timing and discount assumptions.

  • Cash flow view
  • Assumption register

Valuation

Establish a decision-relevant view of enterprise value.

  • Valuation perspective
  • Value-driver hierarchy

Financial projections

Test how the operating plan translates into financial performance.

  • Projection baseline
  • Key dependencies

Sensitivity analysis

Make the assumptions with the greatest decision impact visible.

  • Sensitivity ranges
  • Downside conditions

Financial ratios

Read liquidity, leverage and performance in operating context.

  • Ratio baseline
  • Financial risk signals

Value-driver modeling

Connect operating levers to cash flow, ROIC and Enterprise Value.

  • Driver tree
  • Value-impact logic

Financial risks

Identify liquidity, leverage, concentration and market exposures that can destroy value.

  • Risk register
  • Downside scenarios

Prioritized initiatives

Rank value-creation initiatives by modeled impact, feasibility and accountability.

  • Initiative portfolio
  • Priority sequence

Decision flow

  1. Frame

    Define the decision, scope and evidence standard.

  2. Assemble

    Organize the financial and operating baseline.

  3. Test

    Evaluate drivers, assumptions, sensitivities and risks.

  4. Prioritize

    Order actions by value relevance and feasibility.

A diagnosis is not a permanent operating layer

The mandate produces a structured point of view for a defined decision.

If execution support follows, EMCH2 Capital accompanies owners and measurement without assuming permanent operation of the client.

Selected evidence

Corporate Diagnosis in practice

Selected assignments where valuation, value-driver modeling and financial scenarios clarified a decision.

Supply chain and working capital

Grocery wholesaler

  • PotentialUp to MXN 110 MMpotential liquidity
  • Modeled+15%modeled Enterprise Value
View case
Work performed

An integrated Supply Chain and Working Capital Optimization strategy using price elasticity, inventory rotation and historical sales behavior. The portfolio was segmented to test selective discounts, high-turn products and products capable of pulling complementary categories.

Impact

The analysis identified up to MXN 110 MM in potential liquidity and modeled a +15% Enterprise Value impact through pricing, margin, inventory-to-cash conversion and free cash flow improvements.

How to read it

Potential liquidity and modeled value are not realized cash or a guaranteed outcome. The client, period and methodology are not disclosed.

Inventory and capital structure

Auto-parts distributor

  • ModeledUp to +83%potential modeled Enterprise Value
View case
Work performed

SKU-level analysis of rotation, pricing, monetization and alternative sales channels, together with scenarios for applying released capital to early debt reduction or strategic acquisitions in the United States.

Impact

The modeled scenarios indicated up to an 83% potential increase in Enterprise Value; they do not describe a realized increase.

How to read it

The impact is a potential modeled estimate, not a realized result. The client, period and methodology are not disclosed.

Value creation and financial optimization

Multiple clients

  • AnalyzedValue Creation & Financial Optimizationassignment scope; no aggregate metric
View case
Work performed

Valuations, integrated financial models, cash-flow analysis, projections, sensitivities, customer and supplier assessment, capital structure, working capital, free cash flow and ROIC analysis.

Impact

The work supported value-creation and financial-optimization decisions across multiple assignments without implying an aggregate performance result.

How to read it

No aggregate performance metric is stated or implied. Clients, periods and methodologies are not disclosed.